Is GREEN really the new BLACK?
Legendary actress Meryl Streep collected her iconic award for the Best Acress, wearing Lanvin’s first ever eco-friendly gown at the 84th annual Academy awards. With designers like Stella McCartney and Yves Saint Laurent offering eco-friendly clothing line, Lecoanet Hemant launching a range of Ayurvedic clothing line here in India, the term ‘sustainable fashion’ has created quite a stir around. Let’s face it, from checking labels to clothing care and the choices we make when we purchase, we all go gaga over eco-friendly clothing choice. It’s the same we who team the 100% organic cotton dress with Christian Dior leather clutch, carry leather wallets and neatly polish our leather Oxfords for the board meeting scheduled for tomorrow. It’s true that it is no charity. It is work.
This discussion aroused in a couple of weeks in college when we were learning ‘Ethical Fashion’.The term ‘ethical fashion’ represents an approach to the design, sourcing and manufacture of clothing which maximises benefits to people and communities while minimising impact on the environment.
“If you describe something as ethical, you mean that it is morally right or morally acceptable.” Collins English Dictionary.
We were taught that a business or initiative is not sustainable unless the triple bottom line is integrated at the core of business practices and policy, from board level to studio, shop, or factory floor.
Increasing the capacity and wellbeing of the people and communities behind fashion. Any fashion business depends on the people behind it. In a broader context, poverty and exploitation of the human workforce behind fashion affects the stability of the industry itself.
Minimising the environmental impact of all business operations, throughout the supply chain. Creating and acting upon opportunites to reduce environmental issues beyond the immediate operations- such as awareness raising , investment in and support of environmental initiatives.
Without a robust financial business model, none of the above can be achieved. Good intentions without an effective business structure can backfire. A sustainable approach includes quality products or services that meet market needs and demands and are fairly marketed.
Eco-friendly Clothing of Sweaters, for example, are usually made from either cotton or wool. Wool might be a great renewable resource. But sustainable fashion is also about minimizing the carbon footprint that we leave. While wool is a renewable resource, the methods used to “grow” and harvest that wool are not without controversy. Sheep used in the production of wool are often treated with chemical pesticides to ward off insects such as lice and fleas or mange. These pesticides don’t stay on the sheep; they can harm the environment by contaminating groundwater and are highly toxic to fish and amphibians.
Chemicals are also used in the food sheep are fed. These additives are used to boost growth rates but they also contaminate water resources – surface, ground and drinking water – primarily through the residual chemicals in sheep feces.
Large-scale livestock operations have huge eco-friendly Clothing environmental impacts. Soil erosion, run off and water contamination are just a few of the environmental issues associated with livestock farming. Another, perhaps larger environmental issue, is enteric fermentation. Otherwise known as livestock gas and burps. The methane released by these bodily functions is a primary contributor to global warming.
Cotton poses an even bigger concern for the environment. Conventional cotton, that is. Conventionally raised cotton is highly pesticide and water intensive. In fact, cotton is often considered the world’s most pesticide-intensive crop, responsible for 24 percent and 11 percent of global insecticide and pesticide sales, respectively. Of the estimated $2 billion worth of chemicals used on cotton crops each year, over half are considered hazardous by the World Health Organization.
The use of leather and fur has also created plenty of controversies. Various fashion designers and celebrities have angered organizations such as PETA etc.
PETA has many good intentions. But it’s silly publicity stunts has often made it look like a mere joke.
Being eco-friendly is about sustainability in environment. I don’t see use of leather, fur or Lady Gaga’s infamous meat dress violating the code of sustainability in any manner!
-are made using organic raw materials, such as cotton grown without pesticides and silk made by worms fed on organic trees
-dont involve the use of harmful chemicals and bleaches to colour fabrics
-Are often made from recycled and reused textiles. High-quality garments can be made from second-hand clothes and even recycled plastic bottles
-are made to last, so that people keep them for longer
-come from fair trade – the people who make them are paid a fair price and have decent working conditions.
I am pretty much sure that Lady Gaga’s meat dress or Karl Lagerfeld’s glamorous fur is completely renewable and doesn’t leave carbon foot prints! It we are okay with carrying leather wallets and eating steak for dinner use of fur or meat in garment is not even a question!